Reply to is test optional really only for low income or diversity applicants?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "is test optional really only for low income or diversity applicants?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's patent that applications without test scores signify poor test scores, whether due to lack of aptitude, lack of preparation, poor preparatory education, or something else. Consequently, [b]there's little practical difference between submitting poor scores versus no scores.[/b]

The weight given to either scenario by any given school is difficult to know, since test scores are not the only factor in admissions decisions.  [/quote]

Wrong. You can't be judged on what you don't submit. Whereas if you submit a poor score, it's part of your application.

[/quote]

I was told "nobody is not submitting a 34-36 ACT or 1500+ SAT".  If you are applying to the most selective schools it is going to be assumed you did not fall in their average test score acceptance rates which will only matter if you aren't First Gen or an URM, that is who they designed test optional for.[/quote]

[b]OP here - this is my original point - if it’s only a hook for first gen or URM,
colleges should be open and upfront about it - pretty disingenuous imo  [/quote][/b]

The schools are up front about TO. DCUM doesn’t believe them. On every tour I attend they were very, very clear that they mean what they say. One (top school) went so far as to say that “no one is looking to invite a lawsuit.”

[/quote]

I’m confused, does your kid have a 34-36 ACT or 1500+SAT and you are debating if you should send them to a TO school where that score is within range? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics