Reply to Does Scott Joftus deserve a full term?

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Does Scott Joftus deserve a full term?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Thank god no one voted for dawn. She really showed her true (drunk) colors. She supported Esther Wells doesn’t even know how to spell basic words and doesn’t know how MCPS runs, but sure! Vote for her bc Margery smelkinson told you to.[/quote]

Joftus' wife on the Kid Museum board should have been reason enough to either not award 4 million dollars of federal covid money to kid museum, or Joftus should never have been appointed (not voted in) into Pat's vacant position.  4 million should have been enough funding for every age-eligible child in MCPS to receive an annual pass (without a discount), so where did all the money go?

People need to wake up and realize what's going on here.  There is no way I will vote for any of these BOE incumbents ever again.[/quote]

Pretty much everyone was aware once he got the job. You’re cute but you’re not helping by simply not voting people in because status quo. [/quote]

Pretty much everyone? Who?  After he was appointed, but not before he was appointed? Why didn't he disclose the conflict of interest in his application?  [/quote]

He did disclose it in his application to be on the board, and he verbally mentioned it in his interview, both of which were publicly available. He has recused himself from all votes relating to Kid Museum.[/quote]

Why would you lie about this when it is so easily fact checked.

Here's Scott Joftus' application to be on the Board of Education.  There is no mention of his wife or her company.

https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/C8LLTQ57A2D3/$file/Joftus%2C%20Scott.pdf[/quote]

There is no public record of Joftus' interview.  The public wasn't able to watch that interview.  Explain again how there was "public" vetting of this secret?

Tue, November 30	10:00 AM	District 3 Candidate Interviews	
 List of Interviewees
 *Meeting not televised[/quote]

Yes, the public was able to watch the interview, because I, a member of the public, watched all of them. Perhaps the links aren't up anymore, but at the time of the interviews last fall, they were made public.[/quote]

There were never any links. They weren't public. There was only limited seating in the room and that filled and there was no other access.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdU08EUmGi1KyJHhQR_2k91s-swJ7d071RJ8-wAwxM9hh5KwQ/closedform[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics