Reply to Waste – FCPS School Facilities

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "Waste – FCPS School Facilities"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I just don't think it is sound fiscal policy to build additional capacity on the basis that it may be needed some day in the distant future. Especially when there is existing capacity to handle the growth.

Or to build additional capacity in a school to handle overcrowding and then immediately move students out (to the point there is a large surplus of space). This was the case with Lewis and Springfield Estates.

Nor is it okay to mislead on the size of expansions.

But hey, it is just taxpayer's money.[/quote]

This is all common sense, but clearly there are some beneficiaries of FCPS’s incompetent, discriminatory approach to planning who are prepared to support the blatant waste and harm to others as long as they personally made out OK. [/quote]

External, independent auditors who assess building plans for school systems across the country disagree with you.  Fairfax's buildings and operations plans consistently receive high marks.  Fairfax doesn't get to just decide these things on their own you know? There's a whole regulatory process which includes eliminating waste.  External auditors consistently recommend adding additional capacity at low cost during needed renovations because it tends on average to be worth it. [/quote]

This is absolutl2true.

Adding capacity during renovations is the right thing to do fiscally,  even if some are unhappy that they are zoned for a low performing high school..

Long term goal setting and sound fiscal and facility management should trump feelings every time.

Expanding capacity also helps minimize incredibly disruptive and expensive rezoning as attendance ebbs and flows.[/quote]

Adding additions that weren’t needed is how we end up with many high schools are at 85% capacity, while severe overcrowding at other high schools persists for years on end. [/quote]

You are arguing like fcps schools are on a 5 or 10 year renovation schedule.

As posted above by several posters, FCPS is on a [b]50 year[/b] renovation schedule.

It is the right thing to do with taxpayer money to expand capacity at a much cheaper cost while renovating, than to try to do it as a stand alone project at a much greater expense.

It also makes sense to have extra capacity built in rather than rezoning students back and forth as attendance rises and falls.  Changing schools is very negative and disruptive to students, especially teenagers.  It can result in a lot of unnecessary time and expense for a school district and lots of unnecessary conflicts.

Doing what you want is not fiscally sound and is not good policy.  It is akin to running a school district on panic mode as if every year is a new attendance crisis.

FCPS current policy of expanding during big renovations at a much lower cost is sound, long term, responsible facilities management.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics