Reply to Hogan orders suspension of “good and substantial reason” for gun permits

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Hogan orders suspension of “good and substantial reason” for gun permits"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
Democrats have been given the chance of a lifetime to engage centrists who want reasonable, not murderous, abortion laws, and who want reasonable, not murderous, gun laws.

PLEASE USE IT. We need to keep the house and senate!!!

[/quote]

The governor of the state has asked the state to comply with the SCOTUS ruling.

What would you have him do??[/quote]

Take a stand and sue as a state.

Or comply and in a press conference, excoriate the ruling and say he's opposed to it and only doing it under duress.[/quote]

+1000

He really was not compelled to do this. It's all posturing for his preferred replacement. That's ok...she's not getting in. [/quote]

Let me explain this for you as simply as possible. The highest tribunal in the country decided that the Second Amendhebt means what it said. Bearing arms outside the home is a Constitutionally protected civil right. Denial of that right would be among other things cause for an action under the Civil Rights Act, with all the problems that poses for contumaceous officials. Hogan took an Ostia to uphold the law. Like it or not, the law is determined, and he had no choice but to do what he did. [/quote]

They also ruled that arms outside of the home does is unfettered and Hogans lazy move to remove a law without putting other protective laws in place is what is expected from a GOP governor, which is why people don’t trust any GOP members even those that can pretend to be 1/2 descent for a beat.

He could easily have put protective measures in place 1st.

The 2nd amendment can’t infringe on other rights and currently it does, that is unconstitutional.

Also the current SCOTUS are originalists which means they believe this is what the writer of the constitution originally meant. Originalists also believe black peoples and women are not equal under the law, as the constitution was “originally” written. So sorry if I DGAF what they rule it’s still nit constitutional from
The aspect that the constitution must change with times.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics