Reply to SCOTUS Protection Request

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS Protection Request"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There is zero proof Ginni has done anything wrong. None.

Also, are you okay with people who disagree with the 3 who dissented getting daily protests, their churches visited and their Children’s schools published. [/quote]

Of course not.

You see.... the standard is simple. 
If they are liberal Justices, or Justices who vote in a way which liberals approve, they are most deserving of protection.  
If they aren't liberal or don't vote the right way, they absolutely should be protested and threatened.  [/quote]

No one is saying the justices should be threatened.  And no one is threatening them.[/quote]

Hold up, how do you define "no one"?  Because it is a fact that at least one of them has absolutely been threated.[/quote]

They weren't actually threatened.  Dude turned himself in before doing anything.[/quote]

How do you define threatened?
And why do you assume the general public would know about all threats?[/quote]

+100
The fact that the Marshal of the Court took the unprecedented step to write to MD and VA officials tells me there have been threats we have not heard about.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/ShannonBream/status/1543336871241072643[/twitter]

[/quote]
Ahhh boo hoo hoo. I’ll bet you that those “threats” come from forced birthers. It’s their M.O. It’s what they’ve done for fifty years.

Honestly, pro choice activists are more like to try and do a knit in. The forced birthers have to make it look like the peaceful majority is as crazy as the forced birthers are. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics