Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Washington Post Article On Freshmen Admitted Under New Admissions Process"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]25% low income? Oof, this is going to shift the schools budget from academics to social and welfare needs, you want to avoid schools with farms in the double digits.[/quote] There is definitely truth to this. It's unavoidable. They have to provide all those supports at school. That takes time and money. [/quote] Yep. And TJ, like most successful high schools both public and private, has long benefitted from very involved parent volunteers. Low income families are less likely to be able to provide that. [b]Though I wonder if this number is artificially influenced by the fact that during covid ALL kids were eligible for FARMS[/b], so some applicants may have checked that box following the letter but not spirit of the question...[/quote] No, they were not. Free lunches were provided to all, but "eligible for FARMS" is a specific term. By implying that these kids were cheating the system, you are implicitly saying that you do not believe a FARMS-eligible child could be admitted. That's actually pretty problematic. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics