Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Propose parents sue the Coalition for TJ--you're holding up our kids' decisions"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is getting ridiculous. How does this outfit argue that they care about students when they are screwing with the class of 2026 decisions? Shut up and get out of the way.[/quote] Your desire for clarity doesn't override the Constitution, and FCPS is ignoring the district court decision now anyway. You might have considered whether, with over 200 schools, FCPS is really up to the task of trying to administer the equivalent of the admissions process at a selective SLAC at a single high school. [/quote] The new class would be seated if coalition for TJ didn't appeal the circuit courts ruling[/quote] The new class would be seated if FCPS followed the court order and used the original admission process or a plan b that the court asked them to do in last September. You should sue FCPS too for holding up the decisions.[/quote] The court order said absolutely nothing about following the original admissions process (which, as others pointed out, would be impossible) nor did it indicate which aspects of the new process were enjoined from further use. Essentially all Judge Hilton said (read the order) is "The motivation behind changing admissions processes was impermissibly racist and you can't use the new process to select the next class." He said nothing else.[/quote] The judge doesn't make laws or policies. It's not his role to spec out the needed changes. The original policy is constitutional. It had been used for years. It's certainly possible to use it again. Or just get rid of the new changes.[/quote] It is NOT possible to use the old process. The exams that they were using no longer exist. And for anyone who wants to scream out "just pick a new exam!" like a dope, you don't understand how admissions works.[/quote] You sound like a dope.[/quote] Fine, but I'm a dope who is right.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics