Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Washington and Lee"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It’s a good school but it’s too “southern money” and Greek for most NoVa kids. NoVa kids want prestige (T20 or so) or value (UVA) W & L is very good education but it’s got a particular social vibe that these kids aren’t interested in. [/quote] Wow. Talk about generalizing and projecting your own opinions onto 17 year old kids.[/quote] :roll: Only if you’re new to this board. I answered based on what I read here. You new? Or an attention-seeking troll? My personal story is that my own kid didn’t like it. We visited. Felt just like a small rich southern high school. And it’s the size of most NoVa high schools. Good education? Yes. Appealing to DMV kids? Not so much. [/quote] I know many NOVA/ DMV kids who find it very appealing. [/quote] Yeah they just can’t say it because they’ll get canceled. The school is not generally racist, that’s just insulting and ignorant to say. It has a complicated history just like most old education institutions in this country. Many kids from the NE. School is similar to any of the other SLAC. W&L is a great school - alumnus here [/quote] "[b] Under Lee’s leadership[/b], his students would, among other things, form a KKK chapter and harass and assault Black school children. The board of trustees of Washington College honored this legacy when it decided to rename its institution Washington and Lee University." " After significant and critical national attention, Lee was finally put on trial at the place where his body is buried. Not guilty, the board of trustees announced on Friday. The vote was not even close—a supermajority of trustees (22 out of 28 trustees, or 78 percent) voted to retain Lee as a namesake. That vote, however, did more. It signaled that Washington and Lee University will continue to shine as a beacon of racism, hate, and privilege." (Of the 28 trustees, 25 are white, and 23 are male.) (https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/06/white-supremacy-washington-and-lee-robert.html)[/quote] Interesting that you focus on Lee. There was also a request to remove Washington from the name. Do you feel the same way about George Washington U? How about a Brown University, which was founded by actual slave traders? There’s always about Yale University, named for Elihu Yale, who oversaw slave trading and brutally oppressed natives as the governor of a colony. Other slave owner names: Dartmouth, Barnard, Johns Hopkins, & Rutgers. And that’s not even including schools like Harvard, where slaves actually lived and served the Administrators and students. If going to boycott schools because of their connections to slavery, we need to be thorough about it. [/quote] +1. Guessing PP didn't have a date to Fancy Dress circa 1995, and is still bitter about it.[/quote] - 1. This is false equivalency and obtuse. It’s not unreasonable to be uncomfortable going to a college with a name honoring the General in Chief of the Confederacy. This man led a war to protect slavery and no matter how much you try to brush/laugh it off and sweep it under the rug, it makes some people, to include my AA DD, feel uncomfortable. And she’s well-aware of the other history that you mentioned. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics