Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Mt Holyoke vs Tufts"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]With the exception of Wellesley none of the old Seven Sisters are the colleges they were 50 years ago. Even Bryn Mawr isn't what it was. Because the cream of the crop goes to the Ivies and elite coed LACs. The same applies to MHC, which, incidentally, was always one of the "weakest" if not the outright weakest of the Seven Sisters when it came to student caliber. It never had the presence or national prestige Smith did for a while. That is not to say it isn't a quite decent college, for it is a quite decent college. But as PPs have pointed out. Tufts really is on a different level entirely in terms of student quality. At MHC you will get a much smaller, and perhaps more nurturing environment (which from a different perspective can be viewed as babyish). I'm sure classes are just that much smaller. And the village campus environment is also different. You won't have the same resources at your fingertips that you will find at Tufts. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
