Reply to Is Ginni Thomas A Threat To The Supreme Court?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Is Ginni Thomas A Threat To The Supreme Court?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Judicial Watch is funding Ginni Thomas and submitted this amicus brief regarding the affirmative action case currently before SCOTUS. But Clarence Thomas would rather die than appropriately recuse himself from something.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-1199/173494/20210331132404544_210127a%20Amicus%20Brief%20for%20efiling.pdf[/quote]

Yes.  We knew this from the well researched New Yorker article.  Justice Thomas has benefitted in excess of $650k over the last few years from Ginni's work for anti affirmative action groups and he failed to list the income on his financial statements.  This clearly suggests guilty knowledge.  At the very least he needs to recuse from all cases his wife has an interest in.  [/quote]

If we’ve learned nothing from the Trump era, it’s that ethics rules shouldn’t be voluntary.  We shouldn’t be dependent on the morality of public office holders to disclose these issues because we have people like Trump and Thomas holding those offices who don’t feel they are subject to these rules. [/quote]
+1

We learned from the GOP in the Trumpen years how many thing we sort of assumed were rules or laws were just custom, and custom easily discarded by those without scruples. [/quote]

Hold them accountable. 
[/quote]
If that empty skull John Roberts actually cared about how his name will go down in history, he’d get his court under control. Three illegitimate justices, plus the ethically challenged Thomas? Bad news. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics