Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
General Parenting Discussion
Reply to "43 is too old for a baby, right?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I am 37 and also have 3 kids between the ages of 8 and 3. We could have another (though we would have to send all 4 to public), but I feel I don’t have enough time to spend with 3 children already. There is not way I could add a fourth. If you work, 3 kids is a lot already. How can you be fully involved with 4 kids? And I have tons of help with a live in nanny and great DH. I can only read with one of the 3 kids at night and DH read with another. This usually means that 8 year old reads on her own. That’s ok because when she was learning to read I read with her for 2 years every night and now it’s her sister’s turn, but still… I wish I had more time for my own 3 kids. Perhaps your 3 are much older than mine and require less attention… I don’t know. As a mom of 3, I could never manage another [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics