Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "For the "Close School" Crowd, help me with interpret these numbers..."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Both Moco and MCPS 7 day positivity going down rapidly. https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/covid19/data/ very low risk of transmission even as we have a high number of cases. This means positive case rate is dropping, as we are seeing in MCPS: https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/coronavirus/dashboard/ https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/Coronavirus/dashboaird/January%2020%20Daily%20Data.pdf 1/20 - grand total 279 https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/Coronavirus/dashboaird/January%2013%20Daily%20Data.pdf 1/13 - grand total 1015 1/6 - grand total 1842 I'm so glad my kids' schools stayed open even though one DC was quarantined for 10 days. [/quote] The chart you posted says “high risk of transmission,” not “very low.”[/quote] NP. Are we really doing this again? There are five metrics. Some of them show "high risk." One of them shows "very low risk." You can debate which metric you think matters most, but let's have the literacy skills you'd expect from a high school freshman. [/quote] People see what they want to see, even if the evidence is right before their eyes. Case in point: Trump and his followers. Yes, it shows right on the dashboard: "Percent change in cases: very low risk of transmission". "test Positivity rate: high transmission". I stated clearly "very low RISK of transmission". The doomsdayers only see "high transmission", not the "RISK". The doomsdayers do not know how to assess RISK. Do these people ever go skiing? Because that's kind of a "high risk" sport -- people die; break bones, etc.. yet, people still go skiing. We do (though we haven't in the past few years), even though I have been hurt skiing. I got hit by a car crossing the road. Bones fractured; concussion. I still cross the road, same spot. Why? Because there is still LOW RISK. Not NO RISK, but LOW RISK. I'm just more careful. Same for skiing; we use helmets now and are more careful. I hope using shouty capitals for RISK gets the point across that this is about RISK, not about whether there is or is not covid going around.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics