Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=BlueFredneck]Plessy v Ferguson was 1896 and Brown v Board was 1954 - 58 years. SCOTUS will change its decisions from time to time. It's been 48 years since Roe. Who, other than the usual suspects, will really get up in arms over this? I'm sensing zero proof any voters who aren't already in the tank for D's will get animated over this, or this just makes blue states bluer. Big freaking deal if Dems win CA 70-30 instead of 65-35. I care about winning MI, GA, NC, PA, and AZ. I will eat everything I'm saying if somehow SCOTUS upholds the Texas law. That's Ireland 1980 shiat right there, not to mention the ... weirdness of who has standing to sue here. People outside the yuppie bubble just aren't going to get mad or activate themselves over parental notification, 15-20 week limits, or hospital admission policies. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
