Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Damn, the rightwing justices are really ready to trash stare decisis. It will completely upend the American legal system, law school training, etc. This is wildly radical and anarchist. [/quote] They need to be careful. If they overturn stare decisis and start the slippery slope that some Constitutional rights can be abridged, you can bet that there will be new restrictions on 2A from liberal states. If SCOTUS determines that RvW can be abridged, then there is no protection for 2A any longer. As long as the right to bear arms is preserved, states can then instituted many restrictions on what types of guns, how to register guns, when and where users are allowed to carry, etc. [b]If stare decisis no longer protects Roe or Casey, then it definitely will not protect Heller.[/b][/quote] No, the current Court will protect Heller, and maybe even expand it. They'll just point to the fact that guns have their very own Amendment, but abortion doesn't.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics