Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Texas "pro-life" obgyn thinks it's fine for a 9 or 10 year old to carry a baby to term"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]She doesn’t say it’s fine for them to do so, just that the body is designed that it’s not a risk. Someone stating a car can go 150mph with no issue is not saying it’s ok to drive 150, just that it could happen. [/quote] She is actually saying something which is [b]not based in medical science. [/b]Young girls are at much higher risk of several pregnancy complications. She is basically saying the opposite. If you can get pregnant, pregnancy doesn't carry significant risk (i.e. your body is ready to have a baby). This is not consistent with our best understanding of human physiology.[/quote] You an OB? She is…..[/quote] So you think making 9 year olds give birth is a defensible idea.[/quote] That’s not what she said at all. Try to comprehend what you read. [/quote] She said a 9 year old could safely go through pregnancy, l&d, and she said this as a way to justify not allowing a pregnant 9 year old to have an abortion. Do you agree with her?[/quote] I have no idea if a 9 year old can safely go through a pregnancy, as I am not a Dr. She did not say she would "make a 9 year old give birth" as quoted above. If you want to debate something, you can't make up what someone said, and debate it like they said it. You are all worked up over something made up, not something a person actually said. [/quote] She absolutely supports making a pregnant 9 year old go to term. She absolutely supports banning pregnant children from getting abortions. Prove us wrong. Anti-abortionists are getting bolder about declaring their extreme positions. [/quote] I don't have to "prove you wrong" as it is your statement, and in the title of the thread, therefore it is upon you to prove it, not assume it, The quote in the OP is [quote]Dr. Ingrid Skop, an obstetrician in San Antonio who belongs to the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, said that even a girl as young as 9 or 10, impregnated by a father or a brother, could carry a baby to term without health risks. “If she is developed enough to be menstruating and become pregnant, and reached sexual maturity, she can safely give birth to a baby,” Dr. Skop said.[/quote] Show me where that says she supports "making a 9 year old go to term" You wont find it. All it says is someone that young "could" carry a baby to term without health risks. You are assuming she means something else and getting offended by it, thats on you.[/quote] OP here. She is chair of American Association of "Pro-life" Obstetricians/Gynecologists which supports the banning of abortion in all cases except where the mother is in imminent danger of dying. This organization, of which she is chair, supports the restrictive abortion ban in Texas and elsewhere that do not allow for exceptions in the case of rape and incest. That is why she has testified in its favor. Can you make the connection? To put it another way, she and her organization wholeheartedly support laws that would ban a 9 year old from having an abortion if her pregnancy is discovered around 8 weeks. Neither she nor her organization have advocated for the law to make those exceptions. Hence her declaration that it was perfectly safe for a 9 year old to give birth, which no physician in her right might would agree with. She stated that to ward of criticism that a law without a rape / incest exception would force abused children to give birth. Or are you REALLY arguing that she believes pregnant children should have access to abortion? Do you [b]truly[/b] believe that? Because the opposite of believing that a pregnant 9 year old should have legal access to abortion is to believe that a pregnant 9 year old should carry the pregnancy to term. [/quote] All of what you just wrote can be 100% true, she can believe all of that, however you are adding stuff to the original statement to try and prove that is what she meant. You are reading into what she said and not actually reading what she did in fact say. Making "the connection" as you put it is a lot different than saying "She said X". People here are saying "She said X" and I am saying she did not say it, so the retort is "She meant X" She might have meant X, but that is not what she said. [/quote] DP here. Are you this dense IRL? Or do you just play a moron on DCUM?[/quote] If someone was here posting “Biden said X” and when called out to prove it said “well he meant X” you’d have an issue with it. Why is this different?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics