Reply to Gaithersburg ES #8 boundary recommendation

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Gaithersburg ES #8 boundary recommendation"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

There are unfortunately boundaries that do not many any sense, and usually, those are the ones that impact a high number of FARMS students. Look at the boundaries for Neelsville MS. There is not a single walker to that school. NOT ONE. [/quote]

You know how many walkers there were to Neelsville MS [u]before[/u] the boundary change? Zero. NOT ONE.[/quote]

Yes. That's the point. It didn't make sense before the boundary change and still doesn't make sense after the boundary change when they could've changed it.  :? [/quote]

Please suggest your recommendations for changing it. Perhaps you think the area north of Neelsville MS should have been reassigned from MLK MS to Neelsville MS, which would create a split articulation for Sally Ride ES? Or maybe you think all of Sally Ride ES should have been reassigned from MLK MS to Neelsville MS, and then Gibbs ES should have been reassigned to MLK MS (which is further) instead of Neelsville MS (which is closer)? Or maybe you think South Lake ES should have been reassigned from Neelsville MS to Montgomery Village MS, which would have required including a FOURTH high school cluster in the boundary study and which would not only put Montgomery Village MS way over capacity but would also surely make it by far the highest-poverty middle school in MCPS? Or maybe reassign South Lake ES to Gaithersburg MS, which would have required including a FIFTH high school cluster in the boundary study?

I understand that people want easy answers, but there aren't any easy answers. It's easy to complain, though.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics