Reply to Elementary school boundary studies

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Elementary school boundary studies"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
You wokes are participating in this discussion and you live on the other side of the county.  There's no way you could resist a new boundary thread.[/quote]

Do you live in Clarksburg?[/quote]

DP. I live in Clarksburg, and I wish that this obsessed poster who says the same thing on thread after thread after thread after thread would stay the heck off this thread.[/quote]
Were your kids bused or were they spared?[/quote]

My kids were - and still would be - bused to Clarksburg ES. Almost every student at Clarksburg ES is bused to school, because the school's [u]entire[/u] walk zone consists of 16 townhouses on Deets Mill Court. The students on the other side of 355 are in the walk zone for Little Bennett, and the students on the other side of Stringtown Road are all in the bus zone.

Now hush, the adults are talking.[/quote]
OK, so you weren't one of the families whose kids are schlepped 20 extra minutes per trip each day.  No wonder you aren't concerned about busing.  The rest of us are keeping our eye on the BOE and MCPS.[/quote]
Everyone posting here watches the BoE. Some people just obsess and rehash single topics, derailing thread after thread, while others try to discuss more things with more nuance.[/quote]
Unfortunately almost noone here knew to watch the discussions about the boundary policy being changed to make diversity the most important factor because the BOE never notifilied the public about these changes.  We have to make sure that sort of thing never happen again.  The best way to do that is to keep an eye on unscrupulous BOE members.

And as I said earlier, we can't have a discussion about "school boundary studies" without the boundary policy can we?  That wouldn't be logical.  I know you prefer lived experience and other ways of knowing but the rest of us prefer logic.[/quote]

The members you consider to be unscrupulous are no longer on the board. The superintendent from 2018 is no longer the superintendent. The revised policy FAA is the policy now. It was linked earlier in this thread. It is not on the agenda for further revision, as people who have been keeping an eye on the Policy Management Committee would know. You are obsessing about things that are in the past, and you are not helping your cause by repeatedly inserting these obsessions into every thread you can. Even if people do agree with some of your criticisms, your tone and your tactics here are so off-putting, I don't know what you think you're accomplishing.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics