Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "WSJ 2022 College Ranking"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]More accurate than US News. I'm safely assuming WSJ doesn't juke and social engineer their ranking with pointless diversity metrics.[/quote] Much more accurate than USNWR. Columbia is #16 in the WSJ rather than highly inaccurate #2 in USNWR.[/quote] Relying on UK foreigners to rank US schools is like Americans ranking UK schools. This is on the same level as an American hick ranking oxford at #16 using some weird methodology. [/quote] Can't really take this ranking seriously when Princeton's engagement ranking is ranked 400+ [b]According to WSJ/THE, the engagement metric is "drawn mostly from a student survey and with a 20% weight, examines views on things like teaching and interactions with faculty and other students" [/b] Everyone knows Princeton has probably one of the best undergraduate teaching experience of all major universities. Similarly, Williams and Amherst are also ranked 400+ while they literally are perceived by many as among the best in terms of small class sizes and faculty engagement. No one should take this ranking seriously except for maybe the Columbia bashers who have been spamming every single thread whenever the school gets a mention. Can we stop talking about Columbia just for one moment and focus on how inaccurate the rankings really are? How do schools like Michigan or USC with 20,000+ undergraduates get ranked #4 in terms of student-to-faculty engagement? Just about every LAC is ranked in the hundreds, which is just so, so wrong. [/quote] +1. My thoughts exactly. Except for a few twisted individuals who derive satisfaction from putting down other schools, this is a really useless list. They can’t even get the most important metric right.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics