Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "PAVE paying $100 to go to a meeting "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What is PAVE trying to do?[/quote] the question is actually, what is OP trying to do by insinuating bad conduct by PAVE? Clearly OP is threatened by PAVE. Why is that, and how do we feel about charters post pandemic school closure? Personally, I used to buy the basic progressive anti-charter stance, but no longer. I don’t think it’s anything but a union-led attack. That’s not to say charters did better during the pandemic, but that I don’t trust the anti-charter faction to give an accurate public policy assessment of modes of public education that sidestep unions (charters, vouchers, testing, etc). [/quote] No, the question is actually what is PAVE trying to do. I really don't care what motivations a DCUM poster might have. I do care what motivations a well funded lobbying group might have. The fact that several have shown up here to defend them without addressing what they want, suggests that what they want won't be too popular. [/quote] OP posting a trolly, insinuating, out-of-context piece of information clearly intended to attack PAVE. Burden is on OP to explain their motivations. I don’t really have an opinion on PAVE, but I *absolutely* have a new understanding that anti-charter partisans are motivated to protect teacher’s unions primarily, and thus cannot be trusted to really be presenting an honest assessment of charters. OP’s post is very much of a type. [/quote] No. Paying people a rather large chunk of money is bizarre behavior that makes an organization suspect. OP seems to be calling attention to that in a way that makes one wonder what PAVE is up to. Now I assume they are up to no good unless there is information that suggests otherwise. It feels very astroturfy. The half-hearted defense of them here - that never address what PAVE is after - feels much the same.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics