Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Bowser is testifying again in favor of statehood, while DC govt dissembles on statehood costs"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wyoming, who are constantly cited as the reason why DC needs statehood, has a state senate with 30 members and 60 members in the house. Imagine how ungovernable DC would be if the city council were expanded to 90! [/quote] New Hampshire’s population is just about double DC’s and has 400 Representatives and 24 Senators. Is it also “ungovernable?”[/quote] When we are talking about the future State of Washington Douglass Commonwealth, let’s refer to it as that, and not as “DC” Thanks![/quote] Honestly, whoever came up with that dumb name lost all momentum for DC statehood. [/quote] “DC” is the past State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth is the future :thumbup: [/quote] Just stop. +1 to the PP who called it a dumb name. Using “state” and “commonwealth” together is unnecessarily duplicative and sounds moronic.[/quote] It may seem counterintuitive at first, but using “state” and “commonwealth” together is not duplicative It will be referred to as the [b]State[/b] of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth because it will be a state - on par with the 50 other states It will be referred to as the State of Washington, Douglass [b]Commonwealth[/b] not because our laws are a codified version of Common Law. Rather, “commonwealth” in this context refers to the people and spirit of the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth, coming together as one to help each other and to build together for the future[/quote] The lengthy explanation confirms that the name is overly complex and dumb. Then again, perhaps that's fitting for DC...[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics