Reply to Dem pollsters acknowledge ‘major errors’ in 2020 polling

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Dem pollsters acknowledge ‘major errors’ in 2020 polling"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I still feel deep down that R’s have been stealing elections for years.

And now they are suppressing votes by law[/quote]
I said so on the first page and I stand by that.

Look at the Q nonsense, the centerpiece charge of which was that there was a cabal of all powerful Democrats who were trading kids around. Turns out there’s a cabal alright, but it’s Republicans. They are all projection. So their [i]continued[/i] obsession with alleged election fraud strongly points the finger to them stealing elections across the country. I think 2020 was an absolute blowout win for the Democrats. I think Biden probably won closer to 90 million votes (if not more) and Trump probably closer to 65 million votes (and probably less). I think there is a solid Democratic majority in the Senate and I think we probably won a lot more state elections, too.

Ask yourself: why would the Democratic pollsters all be off? Does that even make sense? Contrary to the childish conservative belief (but I repeat myself) that pollsters want to steer people, they actually want to be as accurate as possible because that’s how pollsters keep a reputation for accuracy and how they stay in business. But if the GOP pollsters are all in on the GOP’s game, they can adjust their polls as necessary. [/quote]

So this is what the liberal version of Q looks like ^^^.  Wow.[/quote]
Not really. [/quote]
DP. I'm a Democrat and yeah it is. I  love the 90-65 victory.  But no evidence.  Just because they are paranoid doesn't mean you aren't.[/quote]
I don’t care if your name is Joe Biden. I’m not paranoid. What I say makes sense. I didn’t claim to have any direct evidence, but [i]seriously[/i]. Look at how Republicans [i]far[/i] out perform polls and projections. It makes no damn sense; the article even mentions it: “Tuesday’s statement marks the beginning of a years-long process to examine why, since 2012, most major elections have tilted against the party, despite favorable polling data before the vote. Up and down the ballot, Democrats have been, more often than not, shell-shocked by defeats in races they thought to be competitive, or narrower-than-expected, victories in contests they thought they led comfortably.”

How does this even pass the sniff test to you? There were several very close polling Senate races in 2020, specifically Iowa, Maine and North Carolina, in which it was a tossup or even a lean D and the GOP pulled it out? Even famously unpopular and deeply concerned Susan Collins? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_Senate_elections Then look first at the expected vote margins, then the actual outcome. How is it possible that the GOP outperforms the polls all the time? It doesn’t even make sense and I’m tired of people like you looking away saying there’s no evidence when there’s pretty damn good circumstantial evidence. I’m not claiming to be some high-clearance person in the government who is the only one to tell you about a satanic sex cabal in the government. So don’t dismiss me out of hand.[/quote]

DP.  You really do seem to believe your evidence-free fantasies.  Here’s why Democrats are always “shell-shocked” when they get trounced at the polls:  you actually believe your own hype.  You sincerely believe that you *should* win because no one else could possibly be worthy or speak to Americans effectively.  Susan Collins?  She’s only “deeply unpopular” in your dreams.  In reality, she’s a well-respected moderate who is independent enough not to vote along party lines.  She also can’t be bullied liberals like you, who insist she vote your way.  Remember - she is a Republican.  Republicans don’t expect Democrats to vote for their issues - why do you?

And finally, as other posters have noted, many/most of these polls are sponsored by left-leaning organizations who very deliberately slant questions in such a way as to get favorable results for Democrats.  And you fall for it, year in and year out.  “But, but, the polls say...!!”   :roll:  There are enough independents in this country (thankfully) who will wait until all the information is in before deciding who to vote for.  They aren’t the mindless “blue no matter who” twits who don’t have a critical thinking bone in their body.  [/quote]
You couldn’t be more wrong if you tried.

And my circumstantial evidence is great. It would be great if you were able to process what I wrote, but I see that you don’t even understand how polling works,  so I’m not really expecting you to understand anything else, either. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics