Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Looking on the Hill - curious for reviews of area elementary schools "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]^^p.s.: But I’m sure Payne is improving and that it’s trajectory is positive. I just don’t buy that it’s all perfect now in upper grades.[/quote] nobody said it was perfect. if you want your kids surrounded only by kids just like them, the Hill may not be for you.[/quote] Space us the sanctimonious crap, PP. Brent, Maury, SWS and Peabody are all pretty thoroughly gentrified/majority UMC and white these days, and Ludlow's getting there. Brent's at-risk rate is something like 5% and Maury's is in the teens. There are schools in upper NW, e.g. Stoddert, Hearst and Eaton, with higher percentages of poor minority kids. Come on, nobody's buys in-boundary specifically for Payne. Payne is desirable for ECE (early childhood), OK for K-2nd, maybe 3rd, but on nobody's list for the upper grades. IB Payne parents still try to lottery out en masse.[/quote] Ludlow is already majority UMC. Not majority white (though plurality), but it's racial diversity is a plus in my book.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics