Reply to The Wisconsin Study

Forum Index » Schools and Education General Discussion

Reply to "The Wisconsin Study - valid analysis?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]nice dodge[/quote]

I said everyone has biases, and I'm not OP. The fact still remains that no one has given a solid rebuttal to why the study is drawing conclusions by comparing a group with 88% kids to a group with probably 75%+ adults, who wouldn't be expected to get sick at the same rates, which is what the original Washington Post commenter said.

The rebuttals seem to be you're a maniac if you listen to someone commenting on the Washington Post, there are other studies that show schools are safe (that may be, but it's not relevant to analyzing this one), no one cares, we're done with schools being closed., etc.[/quote]

NP.  I looked at the study on the CDC page and it didn't really explain their methodology. If I could find a more detailed version, maybe I could draw better conclusions.

Whether the exact numbers used are the right or wrong ones, whether transmission in schools is lower or higher than the general public, it is clear from the numbers over time that in-person school did not increase numbers in the community.  Which is the only result that really matters, ultimately.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics