Reply to What’s the controversy with 1) Maggie Haberman; 2) Nate Silver and 3) Dionne Warwick?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "What’s the controversy with 1) Maggie Haberman; 2) Nate Silver and 3) Dionne Warwick?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Haberman’s mom runs a PR firm that has/has had (not sure which) the Trumps and Kushners as clients, so there’s a perception that she’s pro-Trumps/Kushners.[/quote]

She’s also about as painfully NYT as it gets and that’s a serious problem in its own right.[/quote]

I like her insights/reporting on Trump. I think she gets it right and she's no sycophant when interviewed about him.[/quote]

This. Feel free to criticize the nepotism that helped her get her job, but the people who think she's pro-Trump are waaaaay off base.[/quote]

She is unbelievably thin-skinned and petulant on social media, beyond defensive is her standard setting. I can’t agree with either of you on the merits.[/quote]

Nepotism? Thin-skinned? Petulant? Those are all positives for a NYT career![/quote]

Oh I thought those are all positives for our President.  [/quote]

President, NYT, Wall Street, white shoe law, etc. Lots of seemingly negative character traits get rewarded richly in this society's supposedly high-status positions.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics