Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "Niche sports and rich-kid affirmative action: The Atlantic "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Another update. The Atlantic was duped. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/01/business/media/atlantic-ruth-shalit-barrett.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&fbclid=IwAR10eqXDNu1q7qkrT6kBYIwS30629Sooh_gO_khMYjwGKfGG1P_CbUcCgWY&fbclid=IwAR0j_5njeZxliyGh3-bv-DQISs5BRwgHDJrAzKePpPWLFUbMI_EmhZZsWIc&fbclid=IwAR1ie0DbbmaJpOEdsVcU-bQDsGEW8AbMh4BSCuqBZ0IFK7HztGNW-oYsLPw[/quote] Hmm, one of the sources does not have a son, but the article was primarily about her daughters. The article also included some juicy quotes from the coaches. Are those true? Are there any problems with other sources? If the only issue is the existence of ason, the article is still pretty shocking and damning.[/quote] The apology from the magazine indicates more. They wouldn't be apologizing so significantly if the only concern was a fabricated son, allegedly just for identity protection. The NY article says they are continuing to investigate. Reading between the lines, they have significant doubts about all of this. I would treat most of the article as an exercise in fiction. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics