Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Weingarten/Manteuffel"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Gene acts like he totally gets and is on board with feminist critiques of men behaving badly. But COME ON. There is such a huge power imbalance between a well-connected Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist mentor and the half-his-age young mentee (who was literally a college freshmen younger than his beloved daughter when their professional relationship began). I find Rachel's choice odd, but I also see it in context. Gene, however, I see as both hypocritical and predatory. But his ego will never, ever allow him to see this, even if it is plain as day. As for all his years worth of talk about how much beauty and sexiness he finds specifically in older women (ahem, his age)? He certainly doth protest too much, didn't he? It was a now embarrassingly transparent ruse to appeal to the demographics of his largely female readership. So let's pause and mourn the Gene we thought he was-- the one who respected the sacred boundaries between established mentor and inexperienced mentee, who looked at women the age of his daughter (and younger!) with a sincere paternal affection, who lived up to his claims about his attitudes toward women-- and then walk away and never come back. Because this ain't him and he's not worth our time. He's got enough accolades that he doesn't need our attention, too.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics