Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Homeless person sleeping in my front door vestibule"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is exactly the problem. The people that run homeless shelters should help you not cops. [/quote] Yes,yes, YES!!! If the non emergency line could instead send a social worker to bring him somewhere safe, he wouldn't relocate to another vestibule, or street resulting in him getting injured or sick. You weren't wrong OP. I get your choice. But the system needs a better solution. [/quote] All of these people have been approached by a social worker at some time or have been referred to somewhere safe to sleep, even by the police. They are sleeping on the street because they don't prefer shelters for a variety of reasons. The solution would be institutions for in-patient mental health/substance abuse treatment, but it would take a lot more than just a visit from a social worker to get them there. - MSW [/quote] sad that an MSW apparently has no knowledge of the Housing First model?[/quote] The housing first model has limitations...as evidenced by this scenario. DC embraced housing first, yet we still have people on the street. LA, Seattle, SF, NYC all embraced housing first before dc...it’s not a silver bullet. People have rights; nobody can be forced inside. The best approach is holistic prevention. Hindsight being 20/20, housing first should not have focused exclusively on backend housing without investing in upstream prevention. It’s really hard to persuade some people to come inside and take advantage of help after years on the street. Given the resistance to help, specialty courts run hand in hand with community based providers are effective. Of course, you need to invest in housing, treatment and services. But the court plays a pivotal role in engagement, compliance and success. [/quote] I still don’t think you understand. Housing First is giving someone a home, not “help.” And there is still a shortage. And what’s with the nonsequitur on courts? [/quote] Um, I actually have written about and presented at National and international conferences on the topic. I’ve literally dedicated my career to homeless prevention and advocacy...which is how I know the limitations of Housing First. Specialty treatment courts are an effective tool when properly resourced and implemented as they are equipped to coax people into housing and treatment. DC implemented a housing first approach yet they struggle to persuade many people to participate even when offered a key to their own apartment. What then? A treatment court (mental health/behavioral health) is an effective tool to get reluctant participants inside and on meds. The data supports this. Bottom line: there’s no easy solution...including Housing First. Just ask LA, SF, NYC, Seattle, etc. They were the innovators, early adopters, and biggest investors in HF yet... [/quote] why do you keep on mentioning courts? do you propose we sweep up homeless people and send them to jail for being homeless? it’s not illegal to be homeless, mentally ill, or drug addicted. I suggest you talk to more people at these conferences. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics