Reply to Is AAP race blind? Are there quotas?

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "Is AAP race blind? Are there quotas?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
Are you arguing that black/brown kids had 139+ and didnt get in or are you mad that white kids below 132 got in?

There is a threshold. A child not hitting that threshold is the exception not the rule. [/quote]
There is not a threshold.  Tons of kids get in with 115-125 test scores.  The AAP equity report showed that the average scores for Level IV Black and Hispanic kids are around 114-120.  It also showed that there were kids in each ethnic group who scored around 80 (score - which equates to around the 10th percentile!) who still got in.  I can cite the AAP equity report to illustrate my point.  What can you cite to show that there is a threshold?[/quote]

You already know the threshold.

Yes, cite the pages of the report here please.

And again, what is your argument? That black and brown kids should not have gotten in? This is a pretty bold argument.[/quote]

What are you even talking about?  There is no threshold!  There is no minimum score for admission, and there is no score that will disqualify any child.  Lots of kids of all colors get in with scores below 132 or even below 125.  The test scores are largely irrelevant compared to GBRS and work samples.

Equity report is here:  https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/BPD4M50C2B1F/$file/FCPS%20final%20report%2005.05.20.pdf. Page 6 shows the racial breakdown in the scores of eligible students.

I'm not arguing anything about whether black or brown kids should have gotten in.  I'm arguing that there's no CogAT and NNAT threshold that bars eligibility.  There is no score too low to be accepted, providing that the child has a good GBRS.  If anything, YOU'RE the one implying that the black and brown kids with lower scores who got in shouldn't have, because you're the one insisting that there's some sort of score threshold.  All of the races showed comparable GBRS scores among the admitted students, because the committee is currently using that and not test scores as the main factor.  [/quote]

PP again, and if anything, I'm arguing that the white and Asian kids with the lower test scores should not have gotten in.  These are kids that are already highly privileged and even prepped for the exams, only to get scores around 120 even after prepping.  Since the CogAT is so easily prepped, I have no problem with giving less privileged children a score bump, assuming that they weren't prepped and other kids were.  The kids with ludicrously high scores should be in.  The white and Asian kids with all of the privilege, academic extracurriculars, parent involvement, and prepping who still can't even scrape up a 132 score are the ones who don't belong.

Also, it really does bother me that one URM category that they're trying to boost is "Hispanic" rather than "Latinx."  White kids of Spanish origin are basically white and upper middle class.  They shouldn't be getting boosted into AAP as if they're disadvantaged in any way.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics