Reply to Playing time expectations

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "Playing time expectations "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]but if Loudoun and McLean parents don't keep score how can they determine that their club is the better one?    
it would mean they'd have to wait and observe longterm the development of a player socially, technically, and athletically

in the US it is pay to play so you need to know what you are paying for, Belgium is not pay to play nor is Iceland[/quote]

So I hope you are agreeing that young players whose parents are paying for them to play should actually get to play.[/quote]

Not quite. You are paying for training and agreeing that playing time is earned based on many factors. The parental expectation of a particular amount of playing time can't really be met. You can pay for Private School but can't possibly have any expectation of your kid getting all A's because you paid.

Other examples of playing time such as Belgium are being tossed around and while the 50/50 playing may be adhered to what isn't mentioned is a couple of things. Better talent identification that means better team composition of similarly skilled players as well as a more fluid academy style that allows players to move between teams as the skill levels may be more appropriate for kids advancing or for kids stagnating. But here, because we pay what we pay the expectation is that a kid does not moved from a A team to a B team in order to ensure more playing time. Drop a kid to a B team here mid season and the parents leave. So instead of finding a ore appropriate level within the club the kid will just see fewer minutes and either get better through training or they ultimately leave of their own accord.

Again, referring to the OPs own admission that their kid is admittedly at the bottom of the roster skill wise. The OP isn't asking how their player can get better in order to gain more minutes they simply feel their kid should get more minutes because it would be fair. And frankly that mindset is what Rec sports are about. [/quote]

If you pay for a private school, you are not paying for your kid to get all A's  but you aren't paying for them to sit out in the hall while other kids are actually in the classroom getting taught either.

With regard to Belgium, you are confusing 50% playing time with 50/50 playing time.   It's not the same thing,  unless you have a bloated roster with double the amount of players needed for the game format.

Let's say it's 7v7 with a roster of 11 (I'd prefer 10).  At the end of the 1st quarter,  4 players come off (since you have 4 subs)  but 3 stay on.   Even if those 3 come off in the 3rd quarter, they have to come back on in the 4th, so they play 3/4 off the game.   It's possible 1 of the other players who started on the bench and came on in the 2nd quarter could play the rest of the game.   So out of the 11, 4 might play 3/4 of the game,  and everyone else will play 1/2.

It's still competitive - not equal - but everyone gets a chance to play,  contribute,  and develop.

It's really hard to argue that doesn't make a whole lot of sense. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics