Reply to Dating in 50’s - people who have children vs people who dont

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Dating in 50’s - people who have children vs people who dont"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Men or women in your 50’s: do you feel that you have more in common when dating someone , specially around life experience, with people who have kids vs. who don’t? And men- do you view a female in her 50’s differently who haven’t had children? [/quote]

54M here.

I don't care if women in their 50s have kids or not, because I only date women in their 20s and 30s.[/quote]

I don't think OP was asking the age cohort that you date, only if you yourself are in your 50's and if you have kids, do you also prefer to date people with kids, or vice versa.[/quote]

She asked me how I view women in their 50s.

I don't view them at  all. They are invisible to me.[/quote]

It’s one thing to say you date younger women, but to say that women in their 50s are invisible to you is just so remarkably immature. Sex appeal is the only thing that connects you to other human beings? I don’t imagine your relationships go the distance.[/quote]

The specific question was about dating. In other words, what am I sexually attracted to? That is not a matter for "mature" conscious decision for a man any more than it is for a woman. I know very well that most women in their 20s and 30s are not attracted to me, and I don't waste my time rebuking them for being "remarkably immature". It's enough for me that there are some young women who are.

Sex appeal is not the only thing that connects me to other human beings, but it is the prerequisite for a sexual relationship. This is so obvious it shouldn't need discussion. Of course sex appeal is not the [i]only[/i] thing that is needed for a relationship to exist, but it has to be there.

As for you, I have no doubt that there are [i]many[/i] men who are invisible to you as sexual beings. And for very shallow, immature reasons - e.g., they are shorter than you, or fat, or they don't meet one of the countless criteria on your personal list.

Thank you for your interest in my relationships. You'll be happy to know they are very satisfactory! [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics