Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Baltimore Sun article about Howard County rezoning"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Well, I won't argue that it is not personally disappointing and troublesome to have a potential drop in home equity. Changes to school assignment or commute also matter. Believe me, I pinched my pennies to buy my house too and anyone who endures a long commute, esp. in a dual income family, knows how much logistics can make or break a day. Nonetheless, I'm a little impatient with those who dig their heels against redistricting. Speaking of HoCo - I can't comment intelligently on MoCo, as I don't know the geography well enough: 1. In Hoco, the existing school assignments are already not built to send all children to the closest school or into the shortest commute path. There are a lot of schools, esp. at the high school level, that are spaced in such a way that this would be close to impossible to achieve. Also, by intention or accident, HoCo students seem already to be assigned to school based partly on maintaining a certain school profile and / or keeping certain neighborhood "profiles" intact. So the status quo is already a gerrymandered map. This is particular obvious in southern HoCo. Perhaps it is just the soft pressure of communities to accept "busing" when it improves the profiles of certain high schools, but to yell loudly when it does not. In any case, we're already structuring things with an objective. It shouldn't be out of bounds to re-calibrate based on what is good for county and students in general. 2. I have no doubt that there are some proposed reassignments that don't make enough sense logistically and should be revisited. The plan should be questioned and tweaked. However, I also think it may be human nature to under-estimate or accept a slightly longer commute when the shift is perceived to be positive, and to over-estimate the commute time and impact when the shift is not perceived as being to a "better" school. So, I accept this is a factor that matters but I also strongly suspect it's a front to some degree. See also: people who moved to developments well off commute paths, all but guaranteeing a half hour or more commute, who are suddenly finding commute time to be desperately important to them. 3. There's a strong refrain not to "break up communities," but people are making the *choice* to view their community has having certain demographic or geographical boundaries. If we change the school assignments, then community can shift with the boundary change. And lot of the lines of "community" put divisions between communities that live in very close proximity. 4. In HoCo, part of the issue is development patterns. It is partly fast development is happening. It is also, and perhaps much more, a function of the fact that affordable and middle class housing is built in some areas and not others. A solution to this would be to plan and require a mixture of housing across the county, so that moving students around would only need to be done for over-crowding, not for equity. It would be wonderful for the County to pursue this goal, but if it refuses then what is the School Board supposed to do? It has to deal with what it is served. 5. If you are strong opponent of redistricting, then you have to do something about #4. If you refuse, particularly if you will not encourage or allow for diversity within your local area, then guess what - the schools are going to need to drive students further than you may prefer to create communities that reflect the composition of the county to prevent the gradual and destructive siloing of communities. I'd be in in the "no redistricting camp" if I thought there was going to be significant action on 4. But what isn't going to work is to oppose redistricting because "it's a development issue, not a school issue, don't 'break up' community, etc, etc" when you are in reality not going to advocate for and will in fact oppose the changes to development requirements and zoning / lot size / water requirements that would create a more balanced community close to where you live. 6. Lots of people save to buy their homes, not only relatively rich people. Just because you over-valued your house based on the misperception the school zone would not change does not bind the county to protecting you from yourself. It should make decisions based on the big picture for home owners all over the map. This constant buzz about certain schools being "better" than others and about certain communities being exclusive and others being "bad" devalues the property of lots of middle class families who own in older or more diverse areas. And allowing the schools to become increasingly pigeonholded by income also decreases some people's property values across time. So why is it important to protect 50k of equity in a 800k or 1 million home built 5 years ago, but it's not important to protect the equity in a 400k house a police officer bought 20 years ago? Again, big picture matters - we're all better off if everyone is zoned to a school with a mix of profiles, and we're all better if people aren't over-speculating in one area, and being *wink winked* out of buying into other areas. 7. It's 2019. This stuff is hard and we don't all agree on the solutions, but HoCo and MoCo should have enough good and smart people in them that we can find solutions with development and school policy. Let's do it! [/quote] Great post. Having been on the redistricting chopping block for many years in HoCo, I understand how upsetting and disappointing it is to contemplate that the plans you have made in terms of school attendance may not pan out, especially if you think that you have purchased real estate to ensure that your kids go to the "best" schools. At the same time, I would love to hear those protesting this time around admit that the home purchase was meant to ensure that the kids attend school as few disadvantated children as possible. That is the truth. Look at the numbers. Another truth is that redistricting is necessary because certain schools are over crowded while others have capacity to spare. Unfortunately, the capacity is either in the center of Columbia or in the outliers, like River Hill, Mariotts Ridge, and Glen Elg. Shifting higher SES students to the outying areas only makes the Columbia high schools poorer, and the outliers more advantaged. I am curious about the outcry about the number of students being moved. Of course it is a disruption at first. But doesn't the fact that so many students are in the same boat make the change less traumatic than if it is just a few students being moved? At least neighborhoods would be in it together, as opposed to a few small tweaks that impose significant disadvantage on only a few families. Yes, the transition is difficult, but once established, everyone will settle in. I also agree with the PPs who said that most students will be fine, particularly if your child is in high school GT/Honors/AP classes. There won't be a significant change for your child. There may be some change, in terms of PE and general classes, but for the most part, students will adapt. If you have a child who you think would not do well in a more diverse school (I have one of those, so I understand) then private is an option or you can seek a waiver. As to the issue of bussing distances and long bus rides, I'm not sure that I understand that either. River Hill High School is 7.1 miles away from Wild Lake High School. Some polygons might wind up with a longer bus ride than they would if attending River Hill, but how much longer will it really be? Plenty of kids on the eastern side of the county have 8 or 9 mile bus rides and survive. I guess that sleep for River Hill students is more important than students in other parts of the county. I have my own concerns about whether this whole equity movement is really supported by data, and am particulary concerned about the lack of evidence establishing a tipping point at which all students are disadvantaged attending a higher poverty school. Obviously, the location of low to moderate income housing is a problem in terms of concentrating poverty and wealth in certain areas. So, River Hill residents, what efforts have you been making efforts to bring low to moderate income housing to your area? How are you working to ensure that there is socioeconimic diversity in your schools? There may be cultural diversity, but River Hill High School is not socioeconimically diverse. HCPSS has to play the hand it has been dealt, and that might involve moving students in a way that does not protect your financial investment or that inconveniences your children for a year or two until you settle in. It may seem unfair, but the rest of the county does not have much more to give. I won't call you resource hoarders, because like all parents, you simply want to provide the best lives you can for your children. However, a little compassion, understanding, and even a sliver of recognition of how entitled you sound would be welcome. Over the weekend, I went through several lists of the "best" high schools in Maryland. Montgomery County residents are always talking about how many of the "best" high schools they have. One thing to understand is that Howard County does not have an magnet schools, so each high school takes its student body as it is. There is no application process, and no self-selection. If you look at the "best" high schools throughout the state, many are maget schools and most (but not all) have very few non-Asican minority students and a small FARMs population. If you look at outcomes and the proportion of the student body that is disadvantaged, the best high school in Maryland is probably Poly in Baltimore, because have of its students receive FARMs, it is 70% AA, and its students are highly successful. However, you have to apply for Poly, and their student body represents the best and the brightest. My child attends a great high school that is further down in the rankings. However, if you look at the level of racial and socioeconimic diversity at the school and the outcomes, one could argue that it is one of the best. This school is doing a good job with students from all races and socioeconomic backgrounds. Social justice advocates have suggested increasing the FARMs concentration at this school to promote "equity." But if you wind up pusing the FARMs numbers about the 20%, who is to say that the outcomes will continue to be as good? Certainly tweaking the FARMS concentration at River Hill from less than 5% to 5% is less of a risk. The other point that needs to be recognized is the resources higher SES families put into education, in terms of tutors and outside supports. My friends at one of the "best" high schools in HoCo tell me that they hate being there, because most of the students in their advanced math classes already know the material coming in, having done extra enrichment in the summer. The heavy lifting occurs outside of school, whether it it tutoring, enrichment activities, SAT prep courses, etc. That's not going to change. As the PP said, this is a painful process but HCPSS has to act in the interest of all students, not just those with the richest and most vocal parents. I hope they do the right thing for the entire county. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics