Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Oberlin College ordered to post $36 million bond to delay Gibson’s Bakery collection of Judgment"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Truth is an absolute defense to libel. Not allowing Oberlin to enter evidence into the record, like racist FB posts, that demonstrate that the bakery owners behaved in a racist manner will get this case overturned on appeal. Yes, a trial judge has wide latitude. But not allowing any evidence of racism goes beyond that. I am less clear on the facts in the tortuous interference case. I don’t see how you have tortuous interference on the first contract. It should be considered in straight up breach of contact. If Oberlin really pressured a third party vendor to drop Gibson’s as a client (as opposed to saying the no longer wanted Gibson’s products), I can see a tortuous interference claim. But I haven’t seen the 3rd party contract discussed anywhere. Just the direct contract. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
