Reply to FCV DA

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "FCV DA"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m still struggling with what the actual misinformation supposedly was?

I think you just want to defend FCV at all costs. [/quote]

If anyone wants to defend FCV it should be the club and its staff.  That is not my job.  I make the best decisions for my kids - that is my job.  I originally came to this forum for information and now that is a laughable concept.  I am doing my little part to provide actual INFORMATION to people.  Not interested in bashing or promoting any club.  I will save that for the crazies.  [/quote]

You provided a link that did not answer any specific questions beyond one age group. Not your fault but not worth defending either. [/quote]

I provided information and that is somehow less relevant than the original post - which only said that on a DA roster of 18 there are only 1-3 kids that came through FCV while providing zero support for that comment.  I provide information to support statement = not relevant.  Original post provided nothing to back up a statement (not a question) = relevant.  Got it.  Thanks for clearing that up.  Next time I will just make a statement with no supporting information at all.  Clearly that makes it more relevant.  SMH.  [/quote]

Except for the fact that other age groups were not represented.

Perhaps the person knows the makeup and history of players on another age group and your link did not refute that possibility. [/quote]

Lol. You’re funny. This all knowing “person” posts on anonymous board  and we are all supposed to believe them without question. The link posts actual facts and you are upset by facts. Lol. You’re funny.

Clearly the all-knowing person didn’t know the makeup and history of the U19 team now did they?  But we should just take it as fact girl you that they know everything else to exact detail. Lol. You’re funny. [/quote]

It isn’t a matter of if they know the composition of the U19 roster the U19 roster may simply no be relevant to them. The U19 roster may be an outlier but without the same info presented for the other age groups it is really hard to discern how many kids club wide at DA were entirely developed at FCV.

It is unrealistic to expect 100% of rosters to be composed of FCV developed players but if the number club wide is closer to 15-20% that is a lot of recruiting.

If FCV develops properly I’d say 40-50% is a reasonable expectation. [/quote]

Maybe this and maybe that. The poster made a statement with no qualifications whatsoever and covered the club as a whole. It was a misrepresentation based on facts that we have on hand. Not some guess. My goodness. [/quote]

Well you didn’t exactly refute the claim with club wide examples so there is that. [/quote]

Because I don’t speculate and make things up when I don’t know the facts. The original poster did just that- made up a story [/quote]

OP here and I’m laughing my rear end off.  You really need to talk to other parents on the other teams.  Start with 2006, work your way up and report back.  I don’t feel like posting roster names and where they played u9-u12.  Wouldn’t want to embarrass anyone.  Very poor rate of u little FCV girls making their ECNL/DA squads when of age.   It’s amazing you are apparently the only guy at the club who doesn’t know this.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics