Reply to Please explain the "rules" of dogs/walking/peeing and neighbors' property

Forum Index » Pets

Reply to "Please explain the "rules" of dogs/walking/peeing and neighbors' property"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The arrogance of dog and cat owners never ceases to amaze me. They all think it's their RIGHT to have that animal, no matter what it costs the neighborhood in terms of their peace and quiet, lack of privacy, effect on their lawn and gardens, spreading of bacteria and disease, etc. It's really disgusting.

The answer, OP, is that the legal rules usually say the dog/cat is technically allowed to pee anywhere it wants [u]where it is legally allowed to go[/u], and it's also allowed to poop as long as the owner "cleans it up" (whatever they interpret that to mean). Of course, an animal is not allowed to go onto private property - and your front lawn is your private property, although the strip between the sidewalk and the road may not be considered private property for this purpose. Usually it is your property but technically an easement for walking and utility maintenance access so a bit of a gray area.

The moral rules for anyone with any level of decency say that everyone needs to keep all of their animals off others' property plus any property that others are responsible to maintain, period. For example, the HOA at our last property certainly considered the strip out the front to be our property, in the sense that if it looked bad, wasn't kept up to the same standard as the other parts of the community then we'd get a citation.

But most dog owners and cat owners don't care much about the law and they couldn't care less about what's morally decent. They only care about themselves, but hide behind the argument of what the right/best way to treat the animal is. They think that any cat they choose to own means the cat can roam where it wants, despite the fact that neighbors might not want it on their property, and that dogs can go on people's yards that are not physically fenced off. It seems to never occur to them that if they actually cared about what's best for the animals, they simply wouldn't get a pet if they don't have a decent sized yard themselves where they can keep it safe and happy and not trample on their neighbors' rights.

It's the age of entitlement, after all.[/quote]

Right, got it, only rich people are allowed to have pets, for you must have a fenced-in manorial yard for the animal to roam.

I don't have a dog. I have only a strictly-indoor cat (because I also like birds). But I could care less if someone's dog pees on the corner of my yard. I've got better things to do than hide behind the curtains and burst out the door whenever a canine dares to approach the Sacred Lawn.[/quote]

There you have it, OP. See the above. Some people think that they "are allowed" to have any pets they want, even if they can't look after them without making them a community problem. No doubt the PP is also one of the people who thinks they can have as many kids as they want, no matter how many they can afford, how big their house or yard is, how much time they have to read to them or teach them things or drive them places, etc, because it's their "right" to have as many kids as they want and "the village" will just need to "help" to raise them.

So sick of the entitlement.[/quote]

OK. Let's take this slowly, so that you can understand, yes? Move your lips if that helps.

Again, I'm talking about MY OWN LAWN. Upon which I do not care if neighbors' dogs pee, because there are other, larger matters to worry about than 3.5 ounces of Labrador pee on a remote corner of my yard, three times a week.

Again, I do not own a dog. I own a cat. Which lives exclusively indoors, and pees and poops on nothing but a litterbox.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics