Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Asking for Advice - Rejection from Oyster-Adams Preschool"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] [quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The DC school handbook used to say "if a student resides in a home in which Spanish is spoken regularly, it is likely the student will pass assessment." Now the handbook is conspicuously silent on what "Spanish dominant" actually means. There is a complete lack of consistent standards across schools and drastically different interpretations and enforcement policies. This, coupled with the timing of the test (post-lottery), means parents like the OP who have every reason to believe their child is Spanish dominant, will find themselves not only denied entry to their matched school, but at the end of the waitlist of every other school they might otherwise have chosen. This is a a lawsuit waiting to happen. Of course, [b]it's really only a problem at Oyster where the principal seems determined to use the test to push a political agenda[/b] rather than a reasonable or commonsense understanding of the child's Spanish proficiency. [/quote] What do you mean she is pushing a political agenda? Of what sort? I am not disagreeing with you, I am just trying to understand more of what you mean.[/quote] You don't have to read very far between the lines to see she is applying a socio-economic and cultural standard to the Spanish dominant slots. Just attend the open house or ask her directly. "There will be a test, parents attend, but your Spanish speaking nanny is not welcome, no matter how much time they spend with your child." You may or may not agree with her position from a social justice standpoint, but the fact is, these types of statements have nothing to do with the child's language proficiency. [b]She's very clear that her passion is closing the achievement gap for low income Hispanic families and preserving their cultural heritage. [/b]I'm not arguing for or against these goals, but applying them for a test clearly intended and defined as a measure of a child's spoken language ability seems wrong. Even if you dismiss this as speculation, it is a fact that the standards applied to determining Spanish dominance and completely and wildly inconsistent across dual language schools, meaning there is no way a parent can reasonably try to gauge whether their child will pass the test. The story of the OP is a particularly egregious example. [/quote] I think this is a good goal but agree it’s hard to apply fairly. She should test for proficiency not dominance. I don’t think there is a dominance test that is not based on interpretation of things like heritage, which cannot be a fair grounds.[/quote] Or else call it an ELL preference but it’s not that right now.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics