Reply to The Banishment of the Sussexes?

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "The Banishment of the Sussexes?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]William is coming out of this looking weak and like a man-baby. It's pretty ridiculous how Harry has been doing everything since his marriage that William should have been doing eight years ago.

- Three international tours
- Growing and raising children
- High-level engagements with political officials
- Activities with Commonwealth institutions and countries

Now they're going on annual weeks-long tours of these countries? That is something Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Phillip did when she first reigned. Prince Charles and Princess Diana (now Duchess Camilla) as well.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/a27231716/meghan-markle-prince-harry-work-in-africa/

[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D4qyB9lW4AA25Kd.jpg[/img]
[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D4qyB9mW4AA_i9Y.jpg[/img][/quote]

Oh did you miss the part where William and Kate’s focus has been on growing and raising their children as you listed? Harry doesn’t even have a kid to raise yet.[/quote]

Missed it? No. But every adult member of the royal family has kids. The Queen and Prince Phillip have four. Prince Charles has two. Princess Royal Anne has two. Prince Edward and Countess Wessex have two. Prince Andrew has two.

Oh, and Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan have done everything mentioned in less than 10 months time as she was pregnant with a brand-new royal at the same time.

Amazing...that these people all have some kind of wondrous family-raising superpower that the Cambridges don't. [/quote]

Why are you listing people with kids who are already adults?[/quote]

Because those children didn't pop out of the womb as 6-feet-tall humans?

Their parents navigated the same challenges of raising a royal child as William & Kate do. The difference is they weren't lazy.[/quote]

Sure.  George and the rest will be shipped off to boarding school soon enough.  Not soon enough to please you, it seems, and possibly not at all.  Tsk tsk.[/quote]

You are a loon. Unlike the lazy Cambridges, the other BRF parents were able to work and raise their kids at the same time. It's always excuses for William and Kate.[/quote]

No, you're the loon.  Raising royal kids in prior generations meant a lot of nannies and boarding school.   It's good that William wants to be an involved dad.  [/quote]
DP. They are quite open with the fact that they have a nanny and that the older children are in preschool. And you are delusional if you don’t think the boys will be off at Eton when they are of age.

That said you can’t “focus on raising kids” and then get jealous when people make other choices. [/quote]

They have one nanny for 3 kids.  Queen Elizabeth had multiple nannies in her day.   Kids are a lot of work.  Even if Kate and Will are working "part time", it's a full time job with 3 kids that are that small.[/quote]
3:1 kids to nanny ratio is not the bare bones operation you are implying it is. When I was interviewing nannies a number of them had worked for families with twins and one older child.

I agree that kids are a lot of work. But you can’t argue that it’s a lot less work with a nanny and an entire household staff to do all the cooking and cleaning. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics