Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "Muslims and dogs "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]A woman, a donkey or a dog can nullify prayers. https://www.sahih-bukhari.com Volume 1, Book 9, Number 490 : Narrated by 'Aisha The things which annul the prayers were mentioned before me. They said, "Prayer is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman (if they pass in front of the praying people)." I said, "You have made us (i.e. women) dogs. I saw the Prophet praying while I used to lie in my bed between him and the Qibla. Whenever I was in need of something, I would slip away. for I disliked to face him." Of course, when 83% of American Muslims have never heard of Sahih Bukhari, and don't know what a hadith is, canonical authority is no authority. But if two of your pals from work say it's fine....who else's opinion matters, eh? There's no such thing as radical or moderate Islam. But there certainly are observant or apostated Muslims.[/quote] K troll :roll: [/quote] Refute him if you can. Muslims are subject to Islam's canon, which is the Qur'an and the Sunna. The Sunna includes the Sahih hadith, which is where that's from. Unfortunately, if your uninformed opinion conflicts with the Sunna your opinion is worthless. One can apostasize and believe as Kaffir do, but that doesn't change what Islam's canon says.[/quote] And it’s interpreted differently, just like Christianity is. Baptists don’t believe the same stuff as Episcopalians, and so on. Four schools of law in Sunni Islam. Stick to those. Not an internet interpretation of Al Bukhari. [/quote] Not an "internet interpretation" of Bukhari. A [i]direct quotation and cite[/i] to him. You will never find a Shafi'i jurist ruling as halal something that a Hanafi jurist ruled is haram. Not only was Bukhari, the most respected Sunni hadith compiler vastly familiar with islam's cannon, so were the founders of the four schools of fiqh. The latter ones of whom tended to have studied under the earlier ones. Bukhari is Sahih for a reason. Nice try at deflection. Study harder, ditch the appeal to Kaffir epistemology, and let's talk again.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics