Reply to Is this residency fraud?

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Is this residency fraud?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]"Establishing a physical presence ... for a continuous period of time" =/= owning a condo and paying taxes on it.

The condo isn't your residence. The Shaw house is. [/quote]

Says you, not the law.  She can declare her residence at either property. She will spend time at both for a continuous period of time, since these will both be family properties.[/quote]

You can't just "declare" a residence based on your own beliefs.  FFS.  [/quote]

No, you can't.  But you can follow the law in good faith based on different beliefs than your Big Brother creepy ones.[/quote]

It's Big Brother creepy to say that you can't lie about your address?  You KNOW it's not in good faith and that you don't actually reside in the condo.  You are creating different rules that you think apply to you due to your ability to purchase both a condo in NW and a home in Shaw.  It's disgusting.  [/quote]

Not sure who you're arguing with (I'm not OP).  But you can keep your holier-than-thou screed, thanks.  OP can do without it in the interests of serving her family, and so can the rest of us who don't see 21st century urban life with children in black and white.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics