Reply to Villanova vs. UVA

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Villanova vs. UVA"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If USNWR ranked Villanova as a national u, rather than regional, it would rank around 50. UVA is ranked around 25. So I’m told by people who should know. [/quote]

Villanova is ranked nationally by USNWR - #49. UVA is #25.[/quote]

UVA is ranked high[er] because of its research budget. Undergrad vs undergrad Villanova is a better experience, hence why they can charge $70,000 after rejecting over 70% of applicants.[/quote]

T[b]hat's a ridiculous statement. How did you cook that "undergrad vs undergrad" bit up?[/b] [/quote]

[b]Well, there may be some truth to it.  If you rated schools on a 1 to 10 scale with 10 being the most undergraduate and teaching focused (Williams might be a 10 and Arizona State a 1), Villanova would probably be something like a 7 and UVA a 5.[/quote][/b]

[b]It's an absurd statement, [/b]don't even try.[/quote]

How so?  It seems about rifght to me. Of course LACs will always have the advantage over big universities in their focus on undergraduate teaching.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics