Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "PARCC is going away"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The PARCC tests were better than the previous state-written assessments. And now here we are, back to new and different [b]state-written assessments[/b].[/quote] You didn't read or understand the article. The state is not writing the test--they are looking for vendors to write the test or propose already existing tests.[/quote] Ah. So, we're replacing one vendor-written test with another vendor-written test.[/quote] Either way doesn't matter to me. PARCC needed to go as it was based on the belief that everyone should and could go to college, NCLB bullshit. If you read the documentation for PARCC, "career" ready is just another way of saying "college"--careers, not jobs. As the article states, I agree with educators that believe the[b] new test should be adaptive and test grade-level material[/b]. It should be able to assess if a child is below, at, or above grade level and quickly get that information to teachers/schools so that the information is useful. [/quote] Adaptive and test grade level material? I'm not sure how that would work, if the student doesn't know the grade level material it would "adapt" by going lower, therefore no longer testing grade level material and vice versa. It is also very difficult to make comparisons between students if the test is adaptive and changes for each student. Adaptive tests are great for measuring individual growth and seeing what students know, however they are not great for comparisons- Larla's 100% is not equivalent to Billy's 100% because they each had different questions measuring different outcomes. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics