Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "The Role of Anti-Clinton FBI Agents"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]Actually, in the report, it says that they did not have confidence that Strozk's decision to delay the Weiner investigation because of the Russian investigation was "free from bias." There are lots of indications of bias and comments that there were concerns about bias in this report.[/quote] So what both you and the other poster are saying is that the IG could not prove a negative. He did not find that the decisions were the result of bias, but he couldn't prove that the decisions were free from bias. How do you prove something doesn't exist if you find no indications that it does exist? What we do know is that nothing on the laptop was meaningful for the Clinton investigation so giving it a low priority was correct. Compare that to the NYC FBI agents who leaked to Nunes and Giuliani. They not only have obvious bias, they clearly acted on that bias. No need to prove a negative in their case because you can easily prove a positive. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
