Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "All Souls UU in DC - why did Rev. Susan leave?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]She was doing his job for 3 months every year without additional compensation and had 30+ years of experience when she started. Rob was hired fresh out of seminary at 29). So she should have been compensated better. Someone posted a chart on Facebook with a comparison of their relative salaries and UUA guidelines and it doesn't look great. No, church members don't have the budget. We vote on an abbreviated version at the annual membership meeting. The Board also only ever saw Rob's salary and a total number for staffing compensation. This is why the Board was unaware that she was being paid below the UUA minimum rate for her position. She says in her video that she got a raise of $9,000 in 2017 to correct this underpayment which aligns with the information in the chart. Whoever heard of a $9,000 raise for someone with 4 years of performance issues? [/quote] According to your own post, she was paid below the UU minimum rate, and the $9000 raise was to correct that. But you are also using the $9000 raise to suggest that she did not have performance issues. Which one is it? You can't have it both ways; make up your mind. [/quote] Commenters on Facebook have pointed out that the UUA minimum is a nonbinding recommendation. If the raise was to correct an issue she should be getting back pay. If it wasn't, obviously it was a raise based in part on the desire to recognize performance. I'm going under the assumption that since it wasn't retroactive that it was in part a merit increase. [/quote] A whole lot of assumptions in there, as well as relying on "Commenters on Facebook." Knock yourself out. For my part, I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul. [/quote] Whoever heard of a salary adjustment to meet a binding minimum that wasn't retroactive? Either she's owed back pay or it was a merit raise. Seems like you're the one trying to have it both ways.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics