Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Kim Cattrall SJP feud"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I could 100% see the mean girls vibe going on while filming the show. Kim came in as the highest listed actress. SJP was the main star and always reminded kim of that. [b]I don’t think SJP is as nice as she seems [/b][/quote] +1 IF SJP wanted to reach out, she could have done it privately. But she didn't. She did it in a public way to look sweet. I don't blame Kim for calling her out.[/quote] PP but not to this comment. I feel like SJP is on the Jennifer Garner wavelength- maintain positive public persona so no one knows how nasty you really are.[/quote] +1 I also think that that's SJP's stock character, and she lacks the range as an actress to go outside that. The shows/movies she does well in are the ones where she's kind of a nice, slightly awkward but still attractive regular person. She can't afford to be a diva b/c then she wouldn't be believable in the only kind of roles she's really good at. Same with Jennifer Garner. She does best as the girl next door, approachable kind of character. If people saw in public a dark side to her, it would be hard for her to be believable in the only roles she can really do. There are male actors for whom the same thing applies (as in they have to manage their public persona b/c they only do one type of role well, and if people see them as nasty, they won't be able to really do that role well anymore). It's also an issue for actors/actresses who are child actors/actresses. At some point, they are too old to play their stock character. So then the test is, are they good enough as actors/actresses to really transition into other types of roles/characters? Some are, but most aren't. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics