Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Trump Physical News Conference"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Sorry you people are not happy with the results of his exam. Pretty sad that you are upset that he is in excellent physical and cognitive health. Even more sad that you believe this physician is lying. One more lie that the left is advancing has been disproven. [/quote] Agreed! Healthiest person to ever occupy the Oval Office. Period! [/quote] He sure is healthier than the chain-smoking skinny wimp before him. Speaking of which, was it ever determined why he was in hiding the night of Benghazi? I suspect he was high.[/quote] WTF are you talking about? Smoking vs Sleeping w/ porn stars... [/quote] Twenty years of chain-smoking is worse for your health than sleeping with a model who posed nude in the past. Not even close. And then factor in Obama's use of illegal drugs, and he's not exactly a paragon of healthy living. The point is, where were all these lib reporters following Obama's physicals? [/quote] He was an ex smoker at the time, and young enough that he was not likely to get lung cancer while in office (he still does not have lung cancer). There was no reason to ask about his state of health, or for that matter, the state of health of George W Bush, who was an ex problem drinker, IIUC, but healthy and generally normal. DJT is old, appears to be obese, and acts and speaks in ways that suggest something wrong. [/quote] He wasn't an ex-smoker. It was well known that Obama was a "secret" smoker. [/quote] Well known by "sources"? Arent we supposed to ignore such things? The WH says we should pay no attention to what "is well known"[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics