Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Bill on Table - Mandate E-Verify"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Sessions wants to support and enforce federal laws as written. Instead of [b]hoping Presidents suggest doing an end-run around written laws, [/b]perhaps legislative bodies should do their jobs and change the laws if that's what they want to have happen. But it's nice that you're derailing. I'm glad you understand that wanting to require private employers to check all employees for their status while not also supporting jails check everyone arrested for their status is inconsistent. Not every state has prisons operating over capacity, and since the person's going to be in jail for a bit anyway, contacting ICE shouldn't be a problem even in those states that do have prisons operating over capacity.[/quote] I prefer my presidents obey laws and norms around conflicts of interest and self-dealing and emoluments and money laundering. Until we get that cleaned up, enforcing these lessor laws is minor league.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
