Reply to LAMB administrative changes -- fallout from sexual abuse case

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "LAMB administrative changes -- fallout from sexual abuse case"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

Sigh. The reason your analogy is a total fail is because the teachers didn't like Cristina because when they repeatedly told her they had concerns about another teacher she ignored them. Not because she was abusively mean.

Also, there are changes being made, significant, long overdue changes, as a result of the report. All the families that were thinking of leaving last year and this year were doing so because they didn't see any change happening so I don't know why you'd think there'd now be more movement than usual. Same goes for anyone entering the lottery. I'm willing to bet applications go up this year. [/quote]

Why do you think the only problem people had with Cristina was her dealing with this situation? Lots of faults to find in her and other administrators (true of basically every executive of a group that involves more than 50 people anywhere ever). It sounds like that was your only probably with her, but most LAMB parents were completely unaware of the Fernandez situation.

Also, why do you expect LAMB will be in higher demand AFTER such a damning report? Even despite the new ranking about Tier 1 status and how awesome LAMB is, it's hard for me to imagine MORE people saying, "I really want to get my kid into that school." But I hope you're right![/quote]

I was responding to the comparison of Cristina to Steve Jobs.  :roll:

LAMB will be in higher demand because they're taking action to change things as a result of the report. Plus the new ranking. I can't remember if applications were up or down last year. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics