Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "WCP article on Watkins"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The article doesn't touch on the crux of the issue. Several other Cap Hill neighborhood schools now support majority in-bound populations, or will shortly - Brent, Maury, SWS (mostly Hill, was mostly IB before they got the Goding building) and Ludlow-Taylor coming up. But Watkins doesn't attract nearly as many kids from the Cluster district as it could and, arguably, should. The school is only around one-quarter in-bound, much less than it was a decade ago, when it reached a high of over 40% IB and white. The main problem is that high SES Watkins parents commonly bail after 2nd or 3rd grade, including for Ludlow these days. Principal Bell doesn't sound like the best choice for the school - if she can't please her district's well-heeled parents, she won't survive in a city where upper middle-class parents commonly buy very expensive homes to gain access to high-performing schools. The Watkins IB parents feel left behind as a group. They know that their star is not rising relative to nearby programs (despite endless claims to the contrary on these boards, and around the hood) and many ultimately wish they'd bought real property in another Hill ES school district. The school has been troubled year in and year out since the Montessori and SWS programs found their own homes. These were the programs most of the neighborhood parents went for, and celebrated. The fancy renovation may not make much difference come August. [/quote] me me me me me me me Is what I hear. [/quote] Principal Bell's job is to educate the 436 students who enrolled in her school, period. Not catering or managing the egos of the wealthiest parents. Providing extra support to those students who need it to get to grade level is what she is supposed to do, and we should be thanking her. Otherwise they will wind up in the Ward 6 middle schools doing 2nd or 3rd grade work.. Has she actually removed advanced instruction for anyone or taken anything away from the students who are at or above grade level? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics