Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Insider Perspectives from a Highly Selective Admissions Office"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]some quick replies: [quote]Just curious, because we're years away--how would you treat an adopted Asian child? Her name would not suggest she's Asian, but presumably you ask for a picture. (And I have no idea what she'll choose to put down as her race when she's ready to apply.) We are, to put it mildly, not tiger parents, and I worry this will hurt her![/quote] Her race would be Asian for the purpose of our demographics, but we would recognize a different background if her application or LORs mention it. For students who don't indicate race, we usually think they're Asian or White and use that as the benchmark. [quote]What about kids who were adopted interracially? Which box should they check? Always check the one which would give them a better advantage in consideration?[/quote] They should check whatever they honestly identify as. That's what we want to see, and we can usually tell from the application if they aren't. [quote]OP, for anyone in the counseling community, where you work is becoming obvious from your posts.[/quote] Thanks for the warning, will try to be more vague. [quote]Thanks for the response. One follow-up...so given two students of similar background, grades, high school, qualifications, etc....the new SAT scores skew lower than old SAT? In other words...did you just ignore the concordance tables?[/quote] No, we did review the concordance tables, but we're just not seeing as many folks scoring high on the new SAT than on the old ones. Since a good number of applicants did take the new SAT, we can't just put them aside. We're waiting for CB to come up with a more accurate concordance table. [quote]Can you discuss the rationale for accepting Asian (or any other race) International students over students of the same race who live in the U.S. (many who have emigrated)?[/quote] The perspective I give you will be invariably my own, and this is just such a politically charged question. I don't believe I should describe it. [quote]Can you discuss the rationale for accepting Asian (or any other race) International students over students of the same race who live in the U.S. (many who have emigrated)?[/quote] You're correct. I think I overreacted with that post about how a majority of alums wouldn't be admitted. I am myself an alum of a top college, and we often joke about how we could not be admitted today, but that does not excuse a serious topic such as this. A 680 in the old old test was a high percentile. My point was really that a lot of alums don't know that, and we get feedback that 680 is an amazing score when it's on the lower end. I am sorry for my tone and did not mean to disparage anyone. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics