Reply to Why are the British royals not very attractive?

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Why are the British royals not very attractive?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]King George XI was rather handsome as a young man, but his older brother (Duke of Windsor) wasn't much to look at. One of their younger brothers (can't remember which one), was strikingly handsome in pictures.

Queen Elizabeth was a cute child and an attractive woman. She really looks incredible for 90. Her blue eyes are beautiful! Margaret was very attractive as a young woman and was supposed to be even prettier in person. Margaret not age well, probably because of her various addictions.

Poor Prince Charles didn't inherit his father's good looks. Who does he even look like, anyway? Some ancestor obviously, because he doesn't really resemble either of his parents.

William was a very handsome young man but his receding hairline doesn't suit him. He's still a good looking guy overall. [b]Harry looks a whole lot like Charles[/b], but is probably considered more attractive because of his engaging personality.

Beatrice and Eugenie need a stylist. It's almost like they try to look ridiculous, though Eugenie is nice looking.

The kids are cute, but poor little George looks apprehensive in almost every picture. He has a long life of having his picture taken ahead of him.

I don't think any of the Royals look too bad and, yes, they are not paid models or entertainers so we get what we get with them. Perhaps least attractive of all is the Princess Royal, but she does the most good work next to the Queen.[/quote]
[b]
Its British public knowledge that Harry is not Charles' biological son. So no, he doesn't look remotely like hi[/b]m.[/quote]

No, it isn't.  Except perhaps among those who read tabloids like the Daily Mail for their "news", and who also believe aliens are advising Queen Elizabeth.

Harry looks much like his red-headed uncle, Earl Spenser, looked at the same age.  That's Diana's brother.  [/quote]

He doesn't look remotely like Earl Spencer. And you need to learn to spell. And you're very, very rude.

[/quote]
NP, and I agree with the above. Harry looks exactly like Diana's brother, including the red hair. There is no evidence or indication he is not Charles' biological son. You read too much trash at the checkout counter.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics