Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Obama Admin under pressure to provide "hacking" proof"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Foreign governments attempt to hack our government all the time which makes Hilary's private server scheme all the more laughable and scary. There are also claims that the DNC hacks were an inside job. Obama needs to provide proof on serious allegations against a foreign government like election tampering. [/quote] True. In light of the Democrats claiming Russian hacking is such a huge threat to America, how is that consistent with the conclusion that HRC was NOT criminally negligent?[/quote] And back to the deflections. I'm going to guess that Obama didn't start talking publicly about this until the intelligence was irrefutable. Now whether we get to see the evidence is another thing.[/quote] How can such evidence be withheld? [/quote] There is no evidence. Read the disclaimer at the beginning of the report, top of the first page. It specifically states that there are no warranties provided as to any of the content of the report. They are basically telling you upfront that they are providing you with unreliable "information" which no one should use as the basis of any actions or conclusions about anything. Obama is actually daring us to be stupid enough to believe that the report means whatever we want it to mean.[/quote] No, that's a standard DHS disclaimer on all its reports. It doesn't mean what you think it does. By "warranties" it means that you can't sue DHS for what they say. Likely they are more concerned about libel/defamation/tort claims wrt specific software etc they mention in their reports. Still wondering why anyone believes that the public should be privy to every piece of evidence in what is no doubt a highly sensitive and top secret investigation? [/quote] LOL. I think it means exactly what it says. You're foolish or self-deluded if you choose to disregard those words.[/quote] So since it appears on everything DHS puts out, we can't actually believe anything from them. Including the DHS reports on terrorism and immigration. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics